न्यायालयीन निर्णय
| अ.क्र. | मुख्य विषय | विवरण | माहिती/संदर्भ | अपलोडकर्ते | फाईल |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | इतर विषय | Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune Vs State of Maharashtra The Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies whose registered offices are situated in two different States requires approval from the respective Benches of NCLT. These two Orders of respective Benches of NCLT sanctioning the Scheme of amalgamation are the Instruments within the definition of section 2 ( g ) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act. The Company in the State of Maharashtra is not entitled to get a rebate for the amount of the stamp duty paid on Said Order of the NCLT Bench in another State. |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
||
| 2 | इतर विषय | Ramesh Mishrimal Jain Vs Avinash V Patne On the Agreement for the Sale in which possession of the property is parted with the buyer, irrespective of the fact that title has not passed into , stamp duty shall be paid . |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
||
| 3 | जमीन विषयक | Duncans Industries Ltd vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December 1999. Whether plant and machinery are movable or immovable would depend upon its nature, purpose and intention to install it. Whether any asset, plant or machinery is movable or immovable would depend upon its nature, purpose and intention to install the |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
||
| 4 | इतर विषय | M/S Security Products Pvt. Ltd. vs . State Of H.P. & on 19 July, 2024 | Upon conversion of a Partnership Firm into a Company, payment of stamp duty and registration is not required. |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|
| 5 | गौण खनिज विषयक | Mineral Development Authority of India and Ors Vs Steel Authority of India and Ors . | Royalty is conceptually different from tax. Royalty under Section 9 of the MMDRA is “in respect of mining leases.” It is paid to the landowner out of a contractual obligation between a landowner and the lessee. The landowner may be the state government or a private person. “Royalty” was prescribed by the Union government under Section 9 to “ensure a certain level of uniformity in mineral prices.” The fact that the royalty is prescribed does not make it a “compulsory exaction.” Royalty “is not for public purposes, but a consideration paid to the lessor for parting with their exclusive privileges in the minerals.” In contrast, tax is a compulsory payment statutorily due to be paid to the government. The judgement explained three fundamental differences between royalty and tax: Royalty is charged by a proprietor; tax “is an imposition of a sovereign” Royalty is a consideration; tax is levied in a “taxable event” determined by law Royalty arises from a lease deed; tax is imposed by an authority of law |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|
| 6 | महसूल विभाग विषयक इतर | Statutory Tenancy begins after contractual Tenancy and as such Valuation Guideline No.1 of Annual Statements of Rates (ASR)- (Ready reckoner Guideline ) applies to Statutory tenancy only and not contractual tenancy | Smt. Gian Devi Anand vs Jeeevan Kumar And Others. 1985 AIR 796, 1985 SCR SUPL. (1) 1, AIR 1985 SUPREME COURT 796, 1985 HRR 355, 1985 SCFBRC 229, 1985 MPRCJ 191, 1985 RAJLR 347, 1985 (2) SCC 683, (1985) 27 DLT 460, (1985) 1 RENCJ 640, (1985) 1 RENCR 459, (1985) 2 RENTLR 133, (1985) 1 CURCC 1058, 1985 87 BOM LR 316 |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|
| 7 | इतर विषय | Service of Notice through electronic mode , viz e-mail, WhatsApp is not permissible if the statutory provision does not permit so. |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
||
| 8 | इतर विषय | Satendra Kumar Antil Vs CBI - Notice under any Statute can be served through modes prescribed/mandated under that it and through other modes viz.electronic mode including WhatsApp or e-mail. | Service of Notice under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “CrPC, 1973”) and Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS, 2023”) is to be made in person, asVERDICTUM.IN 10 contemplated under the statutes, and not through WhatsApp or other electronic modes. |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|
| 9 | बदली, पदोन्नती व सेवा विषयक बाबी | निवृत्ती वेतन विषयक | 20230801 |
Administrator |
|
| 10 | भ्रष्टाचार प्रकरणात मागणी व स्वीकृती परिस्थितीजन्य पुराव्याच्या आधारे अपराध सिद्ध होऊ शकतो , त्यासाठी प्राथमिक पुराव्याची आवश्यकता ( प्रत्यक्ष साक्षीदार पुरावा ) आवश्यकता नाही . | मा सर्वोच्च न्यायालय |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
||
| 11 | प्रतिबंधित सत्ताप्रकारच्‍या जमिनीचे मृत्‍युपत्र अवैध - सर्वोच्च न्यायालय |
कुंडेटकर संजय नरेंद्र उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 12 | उच्‍च न्यायालय-अर्ध न्यायिक प्राधिकरणासाठी मार्गदर्शक तत्त्वे |
कुंडेटकर संजय नरेंद्र उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 13 | प्रतिबंधित सत्ताप्रकारच्‍या जमिनीचे मृत्‍युपत्र अवैध - सर्वोच्च न्यायालय |
कुंडेटकर संजय नरेंद्र उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 14 | मा. सर्वोच्च न्‍यायालयाने नुकताच हिंदू वारसा कायद्‍याबाबत दिलेला निर्णय |
कुंडेटकर संजय नरेंद्र उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 15 | Woman's Right in fathers property |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 16 | दोषारोपपत्राशिवाय तीन महिन्यापेक्षा जास्त कालावधीसाठी शासकीय कर्मचार्‍यास निलंबीत ठेवता येणार नाही याबाबतचा मा. सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे निर्देश |
शशिकांत सुबराव जाधव नायब तहसीलदार |
|||
| 17 | Guidelines for Arrest by Courts. |
कुंडेटकर संजय नरेंद्र उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 18 | MAT Judgement on Seniority of Awwal Karkun |
श्री. किरण पानबुडे उप जिल्हाधिकारी |
|||
| 19 | मा. सर्वोच्च न्यायालय यांनी बांधकामावेळी पायाभरणी व सपाटीकरणासाठी वापरलेले गौण खनिजावर दंडात्मक कारवाई करता येणार नाही याबाबत दिलेला निर्णय |
शशिकांत सुबराव जाधव नायब तहसीलदार |
|||
| 20 | 156(3) बाबत सूप्रीम कोर्टाचा निर्णय |
श्री. कदम राजाभाऊ सोपानराव तहसीलदार |
|||
| 21 | Disciplinary Proceedings- Important Judgements Courtesy: Shri. Shridhar Joshi, IAS (Retd), Former VC,MAT. |
Administrator |
|||
| 22 | Pralhad Kachare: Please view recent judgement of Supreme Court.....it makes serious note of fast changing scenario.....it is a must read ruling... |
Administrator |
|||
| 23 | Dr.Shashikant Mangrule: Landmark judgement regarding 156(3) |
Administrator |
|||
| 24 | गौण खनिज गुन्हे दाखल करणे विषयी वृत्त |
श्री.एन.डी. कातकडे नायब तहसीलदार |
|||
| 25 | जन्म व मृत्यु बाबत नोंदणीचे आदेश देण्याचे अधिकार कार्यकारी दंडाधिकारी यांना नसुन न्यायदंडाधिकारी प्रथम वर्ग यांना असल्याने महाराष्ट्र जन्म व मृत्यु नोंदणी अधिनियम 2000 मधील कलम 9(3) अवैध ठरवलेबाबत मा. नागपुर खंडपीठचा निर्णय |
शशिकांत सुबराव जाधव नायब तहसीलदार |
|||
| अ.क्र. | मुख्य विषय | विवरण | माहिती/संदर्भ | अपलोडकर्ते | फाईल |
